When I research a Family Tree I spend time looking at the social and economic pressures that affected the family, in the 18th and early 19th centuries in Britain most of the population lived in thinly disguised feudal serfdom, so I always research the Lord of The Manor, and it was whilst delving through the archives that I came across an envelope covered in 1859 postmarks that would lead me to the Vampyre Lord of Hurstbourne Priors!
The envelope showed a journey from Chatham in Canada through the south of England to Devon, in less than three weeks; a testimony to the speed of the Victorian Rail and Postal service. The letter was neatly folded and looked like it had been read once, then put back in its envelope for the next 150 years until I opened it on a summer afternoon in 2007. It was clearly written in an elegant hand on rough paper, and contained a tale of woe from an old lady begging for £10 or £20 to be sent to her; “…once the Lady of Hurstbourne Park, now with not sufficient to buy my daily bread for the short remaining time that I may need it..” further research showed stories from Canada of an old lady dressed in a red velvet cloak trimmed with Ermine gathering firewood in withered hands. How had The Lady of Hurstbourne Priors come to this?
On Friday 28th February 1823 in the Freemasons Hall London, John Charles Wallop 3rd Earl of Portsmouth and Lord of the Manor of Hurstbourne Priors was publicly denounced as having the disposition of a Vampyre, “…which was to be fed by nothing but the prey of death”.
The Earl was accused of “haunting the abode of disease and mortality like a foul and obscene beast wherever a carcass may be found”, going to the hut of the village Carpenter to await the death of the man’s daughter, so that he might with “worse than savage joy” follow the body from the house. The Earl would order his servants to open his veins with a lancet and catch the blood in a bowl. The Village bell ringer testified that the Earl had thrown a bell rope around the neck of the man’s son, timing it to catch the upswing of the bell to sweep the boy up and hang him by his neck in the bell tower; only the boy’s quick reactions saved him. The Earl had entered a slaughterhouse and attacked cattle with an axe with no regard to his own safety among the stampeding beasts, screaming “It serves them right!”.
John Charles Wallop, was descended from Sir John Wallop who, in the reign of Henry VIII, took to warfare in order to raise booty, invading the Spanish Netherlands in 1511, ravaging towns on the French coast for a couple of years, before finding time to marry Henry VIII’s elderly second cousin, who died within a year, leaving him free to join King Manuel of Portugal in an invasion of Morocco. He then settled to a spot of campaigning in Ireland, and life as a diplomat. Briefly accused of treason for being a Catholic, he astutely made his peace with the King, and the family continued to prosper through the generations, soaking up heiresses and estates, including relations of Sir Isaac Newton. But despite the advantages of social position, and genetic descent from ambitious, ruthless, and intelligent men and women, John Charles Wallop the 3rd Earl of Portsmouth would prove to be a negative vector to those around him.
The 3rd Earl of Portsmouth, our Vampyre Earl, lived at Hurstbourne Park in Hampshire. Educated by Jane Austen’s father he was noted as being very backward, spoke with a stammer, and was in the habit of pinching the servants, tipping them into hedges, and pinning rabbit skins to their clothes. His family arranged a suitable wedding match for him to the sister of Lord Grantley. Just prior to his wedding in 1799, he was lodging with his family solicitor Charles Hanson, when the Solicitor’s ward, the eleven year old Lord Byron, came to stay. Lord Portsmouth displayed his usual eccentric behaviour, pinching the young Lord Byron on the ear, the fiery Byron took this badly and hurled a large shell at Lord Portsmouth, breaking an expensive mirror. A minor incident, but the memory rested heavily on Byron’s mind. The solicitor’s wife excused Byron by saying that he did not mean to hit the Earl with the missile, but Byron would have none of it and exclaimed “But I did mean it! I will teach a fool of an Earl to pinch another Noble’s ear!” It would take the passage of fifteen years and another wedding before he had his revenge.
The Earl’s marriage was more dynastic than an affair of the heart. The new Lady Portsmouth proved to be a strong woman, keeping her husband’s more erratic behaviour in check by hiring a burly manservant, John Coombes, to act as minder for him, stopping the worst of his antics, and protecting him from retaliation by the more surly villagers. The marriage was childless, and there was an intimation that the Lord had no knowledge of sex; at his insanity tribunal when asked to describe the act of love between a man and a woman, he attempted very clumsily, turning to the court and asking “That’s it isn’t it?” Under the firm hand of his wife and John Coombes he managed a near normal life, holding balls for the local gentry including Jane Austen, and taking his place in votes at the House of Lords (derangement it seems, not being a bar in British Politics). The furthest his eccentricities went were to ring the bells of the local church, race dung carts through the Village, and play childish tricks on his servants.
But in 1813 his wife died, and without her restraining influence, he had free reign to act however he chose: He relished attending “Black Jobs” as he called funerals, turning up at those of complete strangers; waylaid coach drivers and paid them to let him drive their coaches forcing other coaches off the roads.
One evening the Earl fatefully told his solicitor, Lord Byron’s guardian, that he wished to marry again. Hanson the solicitor realised that this presented an opportunity as he had two unwed daughters. Seizing the moment he told the Earl that he should choose one of his daughters and threatened the him with confinement on his Devon Estate if he refused. The Earl fearful of incarceration, and eager to have the prettier of Hanson’s daughters, agreed and asked for her hand. Hanson told the Earl that he would let him know if she could be persuaded. That very night the solicitor had contracts drawn up and witnessed, unsigned, by Lord Byron, and a family friend called Rowland Alder, a member of the Gentry who had a gambling habit, an eye for the ladies, and a reputation as a deadly duellist. Hanson then contacted the Earl early in the morning, told him that his daughter had agreed to the marriage as long as it took place at noon that day! As an afterthought he added that the Earl would not be marrying his daughter Louisa, but his somewhat plainer daughter Mary Elizabeth!
Staggeringly the Earl consented, a church service was interrupted by the party and the bride was given away to the hapless Earl by Lord Byron, who according to his diary “tried not to laugh in the face of the supplicants” and “rammed their left hands, by mistake, into one another.” In the space of a few days the Hansons had taken control of the Earl’s holdings, and Byron had exacted his revenge for a pinch on the ear more than a decade earlier.
The Earl’s younger brother Newton Wallop seeking to protect the family from the Hansons, launched a Lunacy Commission to prove his brother incapable, but, helped along by a challenge to a duel issued by Hanson’s son to one of the Lunacy Commissioners, the case went the Hansons way and the Earl was declared sane. The Hansons commenced selling off the Wallop London properties to raise cash.
Rowland Alder moved fully onto the scene. He was seen by the servants to knock the Earl to the ground and reduce him to tears in front of Lady Portsmouth. The servants later testified to seeing Lady Portsmouth, her sister, and her brother, all perform acts of cruelty on the Earl, spitting in his face, throwing filthy water over him, and horse whipping him across the face. Accusations from the servants became more scandalous, one of them said he had seen Lady Portsmouth lying in bed with Alder, her hand resting on his chest, whilst the Earl was asleep on the other side of the bed.
To hide their activities the Earl was whisked away to Scotland by the Hansons and Alder. Here their conduct became so scandalous, that, amid stories of Alder cavorting with Lady Portsmouth and her sister, and screams from their rooms as the Earl was beaten and horsewhipped, a number of Hotels ejected the party for fear that their reputations may be ruined. They eventually rented a private house. A stroke of luck came the Earl’s way when a solicitor engaged to settle disputes between the Earl and his brother, was contacted by the Earl’s bailiff in Scotland and told of the mistreatment, confinement to the house with only two hours of freedom per day, and how the Earl was so bereft of money that he would borrow from the garden labourers. The Earl’s younger brother Newton Wallop was informed and a rescue mission planned.
The Earl’s nephew was dispatched with John Coombes the Earl’s former minder to Edinburgh where they tracked the Hansons and Alder down, lay in wait, and managed to seize the Earl off the street, bundled him into a carriage and galloped back to London. Here the Earl’s brother hired two Bow Street Runners to protect the Vampyre Earl.
The Hansons and Alder weren’t beaten yet. They pursued the Earl back to Hurstbourne Priors, a legal challenge was mounted which removed the Bow Street Runners as it was technically illegal for them to be privately hired. Horsemen and bailiffs entered the Earl’s estate, but the local Villagers, lead by the Earl’s Game Keeper armed with a fowling piece, mounted a counter attack, forming a human wall behind which darted the Earl. The horsemen were seen off, and the bailiffs manhandled out of the Parish by the gleeful peasantry.
The Earl was a danger to himself and those around him, he wanted to have a throne built and sit in court at Hurstbourne to receive supplicants “like the King” thus could be construed as treason, a hanging offence, so his brother was forced to instigate the lunacy investigation again, and managed to prove that The Earl couldn’t look after his own affairs, the marriage to the Countess was annulled, and the paternity of the Countess’s daughter rejected. Newton Wallop wrested control back to the Wallop family under his guardianship.
The Vampyre Earl settled into quiet retirement, I found him in the 1851 census listed as “Earl and Lunatic”, he died in 185, ironically from “an effusion of blood” and was buried at Farleigh Wallop. Hurstbourne House, as befits the home of a “Vampyre”, burned down in a mysterious fire in 1894.
After the annulment the Countess married Alder, he fell into gambling debt, and they were forced to live in a single room in a Scottish fishing village. Alder died and the Countess moved to London but with no income the money was dwindling fast. She then moved to Canada with her son by Alder, leaving her daughter, the former heiress of Lord Portsmouth, in England. Deeply impoverished and with her begging letters left unanswered and forgotten until I found them, the countess sold off the last of the family silverware and died impoverished in Canada in 1870. Her son migrated south to Michigan and became a farmer.
Her daughter, titled by her mother Lady Marion Elizabeth Wallop, married William Newman in 1844, they took on The White Hart Pub at New Haw Surrey, which still stands on the banks of the Wey Canal. Here “Lady Wallop” bore her husband three children, helped run the pub and let rooms to passing Bargees, but their happiness was short lived, William died in 1851, leaving Marion to struggle with the upbringing of their children. A year later she married Walter Aylen, a former Policeman turned Railway Guard, they moved to Lambeth and Lady Marion bore him three children, life was hard and she died in 1865, aged thirty nine. To add insult to injury Walter Aylen took Marion’s young daughter, his own step daughter half his age, as his common law wife. Marion’s line died out in obscurity in the slums of late Victorian Lambeth. All that remains of the scandal is a pub by a Canal once run by “Lady Marion” and a forgotten letter in The Hampshire Register Office.
12 Replies to “The Strange Case of The Vampyre Lord of Hurstbourne Priors”
If I had a dollar for every time I came here.. Incredible post!
What an amazing story! My Great Great Grandfather, John Ford was gamekeeper at Hurstbourne Priors as shown in the 1841 and 1851 censuses. I wonder if it was he who was the gamekeeper with the fowling piece!
Yes, it probably was! He was a crack shot and well known locally for his
skills with shotguns.
Are you related to John Ford Snr through his youngest son Charles?
Sorry to have taken such a long time to reply, but did not see your post until today.
I am related to John Ford Snr (1793 – 1862) through his eldest son William ( 1831 – 1916) who was also a Gamekeeper, although he did serve in the Grenadier Guards and was involved in the Trent Affair.
William’s son Frederick (1886 – 1933) was my Grandfather and he was a Police Sergeant in London.
Frederick’s son John 1917 – 1990) was my Father and he served in the Royal Navy during WW II with distinction.
If you have more information on John Ford Snr I would be very interested in learning more about him and his ancestors.
Gamekeeping seems to have been a family occupation as his sons William, John and Charles were all Gamekeepers.
I am researching an old shotgun given or sold to Mr Fred Folland of Devon from the gamekeeper at Arlington Court Shirwell. sometime before 1940 wondering if it was your Mr Ford
Thanks for the enquiry Angela, I’ve posted it on the page.
Hi Angela, it is possibly one that belonged to my Great Grandfather William Ford, as he was the Head Gamekeeper at Arlington Court in the 1880s.
John Ford Snr 1793-1862 is my husbands 3rd great grandfather through the son John. I have tried to find out if John’s father Thomas b abt 1750 Bossington came from Hampshire originally. On a recent trip to Bossington the churchyard did not appear to have any burials for Ford and Hampshire Records office parish records didn’t have anything which indicates the Ford family lived in that area for long, other than the baptism of several of Thomas and Jane’s children. I don’t suppose you know any more of this side of the family. I’m assuming that Thomas worked as gamekeeper on the Bossington estate, although I note the current house wasn’t built until after they moved to Hurstbourne Priors.
Unfortunately Claire I can’t add anything to what you already know about Thomas Ford, there are good records for the fords in Hurstbourne Priors, including one from the 1851 census showing them living on the estate with the “Vampyre” Earl, who has his rank/occupation mentioned quaintly as “Earl and Lunatic”; makes you proud to be British!
You may be better looking at the family who owned the estate at Bossington to see where they originated from, as wealthy families would take their servants with them when they took over Estates, or even “inherit” them (the servants that is) from fathers and grandfathers, so Thomas, if not showing up in the county records, could well have come from another part of the country.
Unfortunately “Ford” is such a widespread name across most of England that it may be hard to pin it down through any other route.
Hope that helps.
Lady Marion was my 3rd great grandmother. I was researching my family tree and looking for a reason why Walter Aylen appeared as the husband of two of my great grandmothers (Marion and her daughter Mary Elizabeth Newman) – your post explains it all! I am assuming that Marion was probably Alder’s daughter, not the Earl’s (my brush with aristocracy ends here!). I have also found a marriage record in 1828, Mary Ann seems to have married William Rowland Alder in Penobscot Maine on 10th October 1828. If this is her she must have abandoned Marion before she was 6 years old, I wonder who brought her up.
Thanks for your post.
Marion was putatively Alder’s daughter (legally at any rate) as her parentage was disputed by The Earl’s brother to protect the family inheritance from “bastardy’ if she had been a boy a Y chromosome DNA test on modern descendants may have been able to check for sure the lineage, but it’s unlikely that a DNA test would show much through the female line.
I think you need to recheck the source of that marriage record you found, as there is a record for that date but it is for a wedding in Bristol England. and Lady Mary was with her children in the 1840s in England as she appears with them in the census, so I think that the record you have is an error?
here’s the passage from the article that explains how Aylen ended up with both mother (as wife) and daughter (as common law wife)
“Her daughter, titled by her mother Lady Marion Elizabeth Wallop, married William Newman in 1844, they took on The White Hart Pub at New Haw Surrey, which still stands on the banks of the Wey Canal. Here “Lady Wallop” bore her husband three children, helped run the pub and let rooms to passing Bargees, but their happiness was short lived, William died in 1851, leaving Marion to struggle with the upbringing of their children. A year later she married Walter Aylen, a former Policeman turned Railway Guard, they moved to Lambeth and Lady Marion bore him three children, life was hard and she died in 1865, aged thirty nine. To add insult to injury Walter Aylen took Marion’s young daughter, his own step daughter half his age, as his common law wife.”
Great storytelling! Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person